
“A green result doesn’t mean approval.”
— Steve Adams | IBAM
Why Loan Committee Preparation Matters More Than the Loan Itself
Preparing a student for loan committee is not about filling out forms, rushing timelines, or relying on tools to make decisions. According to Steve Adams, the real work happens long before a student ever presents their loan request to committee.
This episode focuses entirely on the role of the master trainer and the preparation process required to ensure that loan requests are ready, responsible, and approvable. The goal is simple: only bring deals to loan committee that should be approved.
This article walks through that process step by step, following the exact sequence and principles laid out in the transcript.
The End Goal: Approval Without Doubt
The purpose of preparing a student for loan committee is not to “see what happens” or to hope the committee says yes. The goal is to reach a point where the master trainer is confident the committee will approve the loan.
Steve makes this clear:
If there is any doubt that a loan could be turned down, it should not go to loan committee yet.
Loan committee is not the place for unfinished work. It is the final checkpoint, not the testing ground.
The Role of the Master Trainer
The responsibility for loan readiness does not fall primarily on the loan committee. It falls on the master trainer.
Master trainers are expected to:
Walk closely with students over time
Challenge assumptions
Test diligence and perseverance
Review research and homework
Evaluate whether a deal truly makes sense
If master trainers do this well, loan committee becomes a confirmation step rather than a debate.
Steve emphasizes that leaders and committee members should ensure their master trainers watch this training carefully, because the quality of preparation directly affects loan outcomes.
Phase One Training: Testing Grit First
The preparation process begins with Phase One training, which the student must complete independently before working one-on-one with a master trainer.
This phase serves as a filter.
Steve explains that Phase One helps test:
Perseverance
Determination
Diligence
These traits matter because entrepreneurship requires sustained effort, not shortcuts.
Students are asked to complete the training on their own and come back with questions. This establishes a baseline understanding and reveals whether the student is willing to do the work without being carried through it.
One-on-One Training: Slow, Intentional, and Thorough
Once Phase One is complete, the master trainer begins working directly with the student.
This stage:
Happens one-on-one
Can be in person or online
Takes a minimum of three months
Often lasts three to six months
Steve stresses that this process is not a race. Students need time to absorb what they are learning, not just move through material quickly.
The goal is understanding, not completion.

Homework: Research That Actually Matters
As part of the curriculum, students are required to complete extensive homework. This includes researching answers to roughly 35 questions related to their business plan.
But the key point is not completing the homework—it is how the homework is done.
Before entering any information into tools or systems, the master trainer should meet with the student to:
Test their assumptions
Challenge their conclusions
Confirm that real research was done
Steve cautions against students who simply “check boxes” to move forward. The quality of research directly affects:
The quality of the business plan
The likelihood of success
The strength of the loan request
This phase alone may take a couple of months, and Steve encourages taking the time required.
Using Biz Tools Correctly (And Carefully)
Once homework is complete and reviewed, the student enters information into Biz Tools, which generates reports used to evaluate the loan.
Steve gives a strong warning here:
A green result does not automatically mean approval.
Biz Tools are designed to guide conversation, not replace judgment. If incorrect assumptions or poor data are entered, the outputs will reflect that.
Key principles for using tools:
They support evaluation, not decide outcomes
Green, yellow, or red results require discussion
Yellow or red does not mean failure—it means more work
Tools are only as good as the information put into them.
Iteration: Improving the Deal, Not Abandoning It
If a loan request comes back yellow or red, the answer is not to give up.
Instead, the master trainer should work with the student to:
Identify weak assumptions
Improve research
Adjust the structure of the loan
Steve notes that one of the most effective adjustments is lowering the loan amount.
Reducing the amount often:
Lowers risk
Forces focus
Improves the chances of success
Iteration is part of preparation. The goal is to refine the deal until it truly makes sense.
Never Send an Uncertain Deal to Loan Committee
One of the strongest principles in the episode is this:
If the master trainer has any doubt that a loan might be rejected, it should not go to loan committee.
Steve explains that the master trainer should only recommend a deal when they are confident the committee will say yes. Loan committee exists to provide a final review, not to decide whether basic preparation was done.
If the deal is still yellow or red, more work is required.
Structuring the Loan Committee Presentation
When a student is finally ready to present, the presentation should be simple and clear.
Steve outlines five questions that must be answered:
Who – Who is the borrower and what experience do they have?
What – What problem is the business solving?
Where – Where will the business operate?
When – When will the business launch and when are funds needed?
Why – Why does this business exist?
The “why” includes both:
The business purpose
The student’s kingdom vision
There is no single correct answer for the kingdom vision. The committee simply wants to understand how the student is thinking.
Validating Assumptions During the Presentation
Loan committee members will naturally ask about assumptions.
Students should be prepared to explain:
Where assumptions exist
Why they believe those assumptions are valid
What work they did to test them
Steve also recommends that students practice their presentation with the master trainer before appearing before committee.
Preparation does not stop when the paperwork is finished.
Common Sense Is the Final Filter
Steve emphasizes that common sense should guide the entire process.
Loan committee members should ask:
Does this make sense?
Can the student explain it simply?
Do we understand the market and customer?
Does the math add up?
Can the loan reasonably be repaid?
The collective wisdom of the group exists to protect the group.
This shared discernment is a safeguard, not a formality.
Loan Committee Is the Last Step, Not the First
When preparation is done well:
Students are confident
Presentations are clear
Committees are aligned
Approvals are straightforward
Loan committee should feel like a final confirmation, not a stressful negotiation.
That outcome depends entirely on the work done beforehand.
Final Thought: Preparation Protects Everyone
Preparing students for loan committee protects:
The student
The lender
The integrity of the process
By slowing down, testing assumptions, challenging ideas, and using tools wisely, master trainers create better outcomes for everyone involved.
The next episode, Steve notes, will go deeper into the loan committee process itself.
Watch the full episode here: https://youtu.be/OkNS9K8dYBg
Join the mission: https://www.ibam.org
Read Series 1 here: https://www.ibam.org/the-7ibam-loan-principles-that-protect-kingdom-capital-for-the-long-term-series1
This blog post is based exclusively on the spoken content of the attached transcript, including:
The role of master trainers in loan preparation
Phase One training and testing diligence
One-on-one mentoring timelines
Homework, research, and assumption validation
Proper use of Biz Tools
Iteration and lowering loan amounts
Criteria for sending deals to loan committee
Loan committee presentation structure
Emphasis on common sense and collective wisdom
No external ideas, frameworks, statistics, or examples were added.
Download Your FREE Resources Below